U.S. Senator Pete Ricketts (R-NE) raised concerns about the Environmental Protection Agency’s adherence to legal mandates during a Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works hearing in Washington, D.C. The hearing focused on the confirmation of Lee Zeldin, nominated by President Trump to lead the EPA.
“The rule of law is what binds Americans’ trust to government,” stated Ricketts. He criticized the Biden administration for allegedly undermining this principle to appease environmentalists, thus eroding public confidence in government institutions.
Ricketts expressed optimism about restoring balance at the EPA by focusing on its core mission: “protecting our environment, safeguarding our health, and looking out for the well-being of the public.” He emphasized using sound science and adhering to congressional directives as essential steps in rebuilding trust.
A significant portion of Ricketts’ remarks centered on renewable fuels. He highlighted delays in Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs), urging Zeldin to ensure timely rulemakings that provide certainty for producers. Zeldin responded affirmatively: “Yes, Senator.”
Ricketts also addressed year-round access to E15 fuel, acknowledging efforts by colleagues like Senator Fischer. He asked Zeldin if he would support creating market certainty for liquid fuel stakeholders. While not committing fully, Zeldin recognized the importance of this issue and expressed willingness to collaborate with Congress.
The senator further criticized past EPA policies under President Biden, particularly regarding electric vehicle mandates and their impact on rural communities lacking infrastructure. He questioned whether Zeldin would reconsider these mandates, citing unrealistic goals and potential energy grid challenges.
Zeldin refrained from making specific commitments but assured his obligation to follow legal guidelines and engage in pragmatic decision-making processes. “I will not prejudge outcomes,” he noted, emphasizing accountability and transparency at the EPA.
Ricketts concluded by urging clear guidance on Waters of the U.S., referencing the Supreme Court’s Sackett decision. He argued for straightforward regulations that align with congressional intent and are easily understood by farmers without legal assistance.
